{"id":2026,"date":"2018-09-03T14:47:58","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T14:47:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/capture.ccio.us\/?p=2026"},"modified":"2018-09-03T14:50:12","modified_gmt":"2018-09-03T14:50:12","slug":"binary-computing-never-equal-quantum-computing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/2018\/09\/03\/binary-computing-never-equal-quantum-computing\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Binary Computing will never equal Quantum Computing"},"content":{"rendered":"<body><p><\/p>I came across an <a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2018-09-quantum-weirdness-chicken-egg-paradox.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">interesting article<\/a> concerning the (quantum) problem at the core of modern Artificial Intelligence:\u00a0 Cause and Effect.\n<blockquote>\n<h2>Quantum weirdness in \u2018chicken or egg\u2019 paradox<\/h2>\n<blockquote><p>The \u201cchicken or egg\u201d paradox was first proposed by philosophers in Ancient Greece to describe the problem of determining cause-and-effect.<\/p>\n<p>Now, a team of physicists from The University of Queensland and the N\u00c9EL Institute has shown that, as far as quantum physics is concerned, the chicken and the egg can both come first.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2018-09-quantum-weirdness-chicken-egg-paradox.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-2028 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/capture.ccio.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/quantum-computing-300x213.jpg\" alt=\"The nature of All things Quantum is dynamic, not static. \" width=\"300\" height=\"213\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As I was reading through the article, I came across this paragraph:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dr Jacqui Romero from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems said that in quantum physics, cause-and-effect is not always as straightforward as one event causing another.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe weirdness of quantum mechanics means that events can happen without a set order,\u201d she said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And herein lies the proverbial \u2018rub\u2019, as it were: binary systems don\u2019t really do \u201cweird,\u201d and most definitely require a set order.\u00a0 Even <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Functional_programming\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">functional languages<\/a> such as <a href=\"http:\/\/capture.ccio.us\/java-javascript-living-together\/\">JavaScript<\/a> are confined to this binary order of things.<\/p>\n<h3><i>\u201cOnce the rockets go up, who cares where they come down. That\u2019s not my department, says Werner Von Braun.\u201d<\/i><\/h3>\n<h3>\u2014 Tom Leher<\/h3>\n<div align=\"center\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/TjDEsGZLbio\" width=\"560\" height=\"314\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>Consider the common computing terms like \u2018Just in Time\u2019 (JIT), First in, First Out (FIFO), and the venerable \u2018Garbage in, Garbage out\u2019 (GIGO). There\u2019s a common assumption here that may have been lost due to the nature of binary computing. That assumption is: We know where and when things will be occurring. We know what will be first in, and thus first out. We know where the garbage goes in, and where it will come out. We can know with exact precision when to inject dependencies with JIT injection. These are all quantifiable events because we declare them in such a manner. <em>If \u2018a\u2019 equals \u2018b\u2019 then do \u2018c\u2019, otherwise do \u2018d\u2019<\/em>, in rudimentary terms. It is <strong>simply not that way<\/strong> in a quantum world.\u00a0 In the quantum world, one day \u2018a\u2019 equals \u2018b\u2019 leads to \u2018c\u2019, and the next day it leads to \u2018e\u2019.\u00a0 Further, trying to describe quantum ideals within the constraints of a quantitative system more than likely will diminish the quality of the original, ultimately, then, lessening the accuracy.<\/p>\n<p>So, which did come first?\u00a0 Neither.<\/p>\n<p>With our Western minds so inextricably wed to building relationships based on Cause and Effect, it is difficult to fathom that the chicken and the egg arrived simultaneously, much like it is to consider Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019s Cat both alive and dead and the same time, but such is the nature of the quantum worldview.<\/p>\n<p>It is, however, this exact dynamism that a binary system will never be able to reproduce by simple definition.\u00a0 Binary states are static, quantum states are dynamic, to put it in layman\u2019s terms.\u00a0 As such, the rule of thumb is that a quantum state can be binary (by choice), but a binary system can never be quantum.<\/p>\n<h3>\u201cSometimes it\u2019s a little better to travel than to arrive\u201d<br>\n\u2015\u00a0<span class=\"authorOrTitle\">Robert M. Pirsig,\u00a0<\/span><span id=\"quote_book_link_629\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/work\/quotes\/175720\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values<\/a><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>As an ultimate <i>raison d\u2019\u00eatre,<\/i> quantum processes love to travel, whereas binary processes live only to arrive.\u00a0 I believe that is an apt analogy.\u00a0 In a quantum process, it\u2019s really all about problem solving via a cascading path of infinite variation.\u00a0 This is an illustration of the indefinite causal order discussed (and proven) in the above article, whereas a binary system resolves problems using a determinate causal order.<\/p>\n<p>So when we ask: \u201cWhich came first, the Chicken or the Egg,\u201d we ask this from a distinctly binary mindset (a quantum computer emulating binary thought).\u00a0 \u00a0The qualitative reality of the answer to this question is the desire for there to be Chickens and Eggs came first.<\/p>\n<p>Abracadabra, I create as I speak.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I came across an interesting article concerning the (quantum) problem at the core of modern Artificial Intelligence:\u00a0 Cause and Effect. Quantum weirdness in \u2018chicken or egg\u2019 paradox The \u201cchicken or egg\u201d paradox was first proposed by philosophers in Ancient Greece to describe the problem of determining cause-and-effect. Now, a team of physicists from The University [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2026\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capture.club\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}